![\"Wendy's\"](\"https:\/\/businessecon.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/Wendys.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
‘Quality is still our recipe’ – Dave Thomas, Founder of Wendy’s<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Wendy’s is the second largest publicly traded informal eating-out (fast-food) hamburger chain. Its current market capitalization places it around $5 Billion. Therefore, it falls into the mid-cap arena of stocks. At the time of this article’s inception, November 2021, Wendy’s was trading on the NASDAQ at $23 per share. Its intrinsic value<\/strong><\/span><\/a> is a little less than half the market value and a value investor’s buy point is around $8 per share. The company does pay a small dividend. Current dividend yield is slightly less than 2%. Overall, the company is profitable but stagnant related to growth. Stated succinctly, Wendy’s is nowhere near worth current market value of more than $20 per share.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n This company runs the industry financial model commonly used with other fast-food restaurant chains. It has three revenue and expense segments of operations. The first and core segment is the traditional corporate owned locations. Wendy’s has 361 company owned stores. As such, they have a traditional profit and loss calculation associated with this segment. A second segment and the real driving force of profit is the franchising<\/span><\/strong><\/a> arm of the company. There are 6,467 franchisees, with corporate owned stores, Wendy’s totals 6,828 restaurants. This segment is driven by the 4% franchise fee placed on all sales of the franchisees. Similar to McDonalds<\/strong><\/span><\/a>, the core source of profitability stems from the franchising aspect of operations. A third and not as profitable as franchising is the real estate arm. Just like McDonalds and other well managed restaurant chains, Wendy’s negotiates long-term leases of property in ideal locations and in turn negotiates beneficial long-term leases with franchisees to pay rent for the use of that land. The franchisee uses their capital to build the store, equip it and initiate operations at that site.<\/span><\/p>\n Unlike McDonalds, Wendy’s has <\/span>failed to generate any profit from its corporate run segment. The corporate run stores generate a 14.9% operating margin; but once you add this segments’ share of depreciation, G&A and other allocated costs, this segment loses money for Wendy’s. In comparison, McDonalds generates an 11.4% net profit after taxes from this same segment. This greatly impacts the intrinsic value formula as will be illustrated later. For now, it is important to look at the overall picture. How much is a corporate owned store worth, and how much is a franchisee store worth to an investor?<\/span><\/p>\n A well run fast-food operation site is worth between $1.3 Million and $1.7 Million net of associated liabilities for the physical assets. This net worth includes the long-term rights to a particular geographic location and access to a stable and qualified workforce. To provide a conservative approach to valuation, a mid-range value is used to approximate the value of each of the corporate owned restaurants. Using a $1.5 Million valuation (the name Wendy’s bumps the site locations’ value higher than a none recognized name) and with 361 stores, Wendy’s corporate owned assets have a reasonable fair market value in the range of $525 Million to $550 Million.<\/span><\/p>\n A typical Wendy’s will generate around $1.7 Million of revenue in a year. With a 4% franchise royalty, each location must pay Wendy’s $68,000 per year in royalties. Thus, Wendy’s gets its $375,000 of value every 5.5 years which is indeed reasonable. Therefore, the asset valuation principle used above for franchisees is a fair viewpoint or estimate of total value.<\/span><\/p>\n The last segment is land leasing. Wendy’s owns the rights to the leases and collects fees from franchisees. The difference between rental income and rental lease costs are around $107 Million. Assuming some reasonable costs associated with monitoring and administering this program, Wendy’s is easily clearing $50 Million per year from this segment of revenue sources. Using a basic multiplier of 6X of this value, this adds another $300 Million to the overall asset and royalties’ valuation.<\/span><\/p>\n Thus, in total, Wendy’s asset valuation is as follows:<\/span> There are currently 226 million shares outstanding in the market. Thus, each share is worth about $14.50.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n This method of valuation is asset driven and not income driven. Income driven valuations use a different formula to determine intrinsic value.<\/span><\/p>\n Valuation based on income requires several underlying elements present to have confidence in the outcome. Wendy’s satisfies these elements:<\/span><\/p>\n Wendy’s satisfies all the required elements. The company has been in business for 52 years. Secondly, it rarely generates a loss. See this historical depiction:<\/span><\/p>\n The most important piece of information to gather from this is that Wendy’s is indeed profitable from year to year. It isn’t wildly profitable, but it is profitable.<\/span><\/p>\n In addition, the company has borrowing capacity along with over $500 Million of an equity position to withstand an extended economic downturn. Therefore, it is acceptable to use an income-based formula to determine intrinsic value.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n A sidebar is appropriate here. Many readers will wonder why not use the free cash flow of the company adjusted for growth and discount the future free cash flow. This is one of the most common tools readers discover when asking about intrinsic value. However, utilizing a discounted future cash flow stream is highly dependent on accurately estimating future cash flow for the entity in question. This is really easy for DOW and Large-Cap companies. For Mid, Small and Penny stock categories, it is an attempt at frustration. Look at Wendy’s cash flow for the last three years. It is highly volatile and worse, it is inconsistent from line to line for cash flows from operations. Thus, any outcome from this tool would require the user to make lots of adjustments to the cash flow value in order to generate a reliable result. Most readers are not CPA’s and as such, are not aware of how to make these adjustments when performing this step. The outcome would be untrustworthy.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Now the question is: ‘How much is Wendy’s income?’.<\/span><\/p>\n In 2018, Wendy’s sold off its ownership rights carried over from 2012’s divesture of Arby’s. Adjusted for income taxes, Wendy’s gain off the sale of that investment approximated $360 Million, again, net of taxes. Thus, in 2018, normal operations for Wendy’s netted $100 Million ($460M – $360M). Using the past seven years of income including income reported through the third quarter of 2021 (released on 11\/10\/21); Wendy’s averages $145 Million per year as net income after taxes. This even includes the impact of COVID-19 in 2020 and in early 2021.<\/span><\/p>\n To value this average $145 Million per year net income, a second piece of information is required. It is called the ‘discount rate’. In effect, it is a value applied against a known to determine its long-term outcome (result). The ‘discount rate’s’ application is an inverse operation. The higher the discount rate, the lower the resultant value. The final formula is a finance formula called Net Present Value. Basically, we assume the net income will exist at a similar value indefinitely and those payments out into the future are discounted back to a value in today’s dollars. With each successive year, the current value of that longer time out into the future is significantly less tied to this discount rate. Once the formula starts discounting beyond the 18th year, the additional inclusive discounted value falls below four cents per share. In effect, it isn’t necessary to determine the net additional contribution amount beyond 20 years as it will have no bearing on the end decision related to intrinsic value for this stock. In addition, over this extended period of time, there will be economic recessions and this may produce negative profits during those respective years. Thus, for investment of this nature, using the current average of the most recent seven years is a reasonable expectation of future earnings.<\/span><\/p>\n One last note to include about the use of this formula. Many mathematical professionals will tell you that the future income stream for Wendy’s will increase, referred to as a growth rate into the future. The author agrees with the concept of using a growth rate, but disagrees that it is applicable in this case. Look at the pattern above for Wendy’s income. First it is highly volatile; secondly, Wendy’s has not demonstrated real growth of any sort during the last seven years. Growth of one or two percent is not real growth, it isn’t even keeping up with the overall growth of the economy. A value investor has to be realistic, real growth means three and four percent per year, year over year. This is simply not happening with Wendy’s. Thus, including a growth rate with Wendy’s formula isn’t going to really make any real difference with the end result. It may change it by one or two percent; but one or two percent on a $10 outcome is only 20 cents or so. It isn’t going to change a value investors decision model. Thus, there is no need to determine and include a growth rate in the formula.<\/span><\/p>\n The question now is: ‘What is an appropriate discount rate?’ The answer is a function of four core elements of determining discount rate. They are as follows and include a simple definition:<\/span><\/p>\n For Wendy’s the discount rate (November 2021) is determined as follows:<\/span><\/p>\n Therefore, a reasonable discount rate for a Wendy’s investment is around 11.5%. Again, the higher the value, the lower the result with the discount formula. What is the market value of Wendy’s income?<\/span><\/p>\n Formula: Net Present Value of Future Earnings<\/span> If Wendy’s discount rate were higher, 14%, the income stream’s value would be less at $961,000,000. At 8%, the result is $1,424,000,000. This is important to understand, there is a $463,000,000 spread between the two extremes. With 226 million shares in the market, this spread can impact the value as much as $2.05 per share. As stated multiple times in the lessons about value investing<\/strong><\/span><\/a>, intrinsic value calculation is NOT<\/strong> an exact science. It is a range; your goal is to try and keep that range as narrow as possible to provide a high level of confidence with its outcome.<\/span><\/p>\n Many of you, especially investment analysts, are having a difficult time accepting an intrinsic value of $5.00 per share especially since Wendy’s market price has exceeded $10\/share for the last six years. The income method is extremely conservative when determining value. It is highly reliant on the average of many years of income, thus recent higher earnings are dampened with their impact due to the averaging effect. Therefore, the formula’s outcome could be relatively understated if the company’s net income will continue to improve in the near future and of course the outcome value will have the opposite impact if the company’s recent earnings are declining; which is the case with Wendy’s. In effect, the $5 per share intrinsic valuation is generous. Overall, this intrinsic value method provides a high level of confidence when stating intrinsic value. With Wendy’s, $4.25 is the valuation or for sake of simplicity, $5 per share. There is a high level of confidence that Wendy’s is worth at least $5 per share. Still, this appears and feels low for such a highly visible company. After all, we are talking about 6,828 restaurants.<\/span><\/p>\n Are there other alternative intrinsic value methods?<\/span><\/p>\n Another commonly accepted method to determine value is combining existing book value and the result of the dividend yield.<\/span><\/p>\nWendy’s – Intrinsic Value of Stock Driven by Asset Valuation and Royalties<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\n
![\"Wendy's\"](\"https:\/\/businessecon.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/Wendys-Store-scaled.jpg\")
The second piece and more lucrative to Wendy’s is the franchising arrangement. Here, a different application principle is applied. In a franchising arrangement, the franchisor is getting paid for the use of the name. Four percent of all sales equates to $415 Million in 2020. In addition, Wendy’s receives a license fee from the franchisees which equates to an additional $30 Million. However, much of the costs associated with franchising is directly tied to the license and not so much with royalties. Since a typical well-run establishment will earn an 11.4% profit after taxes without a royalty fee, and assuming a reasonable 28% cumulative tax rate, the actual profit before royalty expenditure is around 15.8%. Thus a 4% royalty is about 1\/4 of the restaurants’ value. Therefore, it is reasonable to deduce that a franchisee operated store is worth about $375,00 (1\/4 of $1.5 Million valuation). With 6,467 franchisees and a franchisee asset valuation of $375,000 each, this equates to a total combined value of $2,425 Million ($2.425 Billion) for the franchise locations. A value investor would ask if this is reasonable. Let’s look at this in a slightly different way.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Value of Corporate Owned Stores\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0$550 Million<\/span><\/span>
\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Value of Franchisees as an Asset\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a02,425 Million<\/span>
\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Value of Land Lease Rights\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 300 Million<\/span><\/span>
\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Total Asset Valuation of Wendy’s\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 $3,275 Million ($3.275 Billion)<\/span><\/p>\nIntrinsic Value of Stock Based on Income<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n
\n
![\"Wendy's\"](\"https:\/\/businessecon.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/Wendys-Net-Income-by-Year.png\")
2018 is an anomaly associated with the spin-off of Wendy’s rights in Arby’s.<\/span><\/p>\n\n
\n
\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0= $1,117,924,000<\/span><\/p>\n![\"Wendy's\"](\"https:\/\/businessecon.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/Wendys-Inside.jpg\")
Using income to determine intrinsic value for Wendy’s, the final result is $1,118 Million divided by 226 million shares or about $4.95 per share. At the high end (8% discount) the value equates to $6.30\/share; at the low end it is $4.25\/share. Thus, Wendy’s is a good investment if the value investor relies solely on income to determine an appropriate intrinsic value AND the market price per share could dip down below $5 per share.<\/span><\/p>\nWendy’s – Intrinsic Value of Stock Based on Book Value and Dividend Yield<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n