armember-membership
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home1/wanrru6iyyto/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114ARMember
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home1/wanrru6iyyto/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114The activity ratios measure performance of a current asset<\/span><\/strong>\u00a0on the balance sheet against a corresponding area of the income statement. The working capital turnover is the most encompassing of all the activity ratios<\/span><\/strong><\/a>; in effect, it is the most general of the activity ratios. This particular ratio measures the ability of management to efficiently utilize net current assets. For those readers that don’t know or have forgotten, working capital<\/span><\/strong><\/a> is all gross current assets less <\/span>current liabilitie<\/span>s<\/span>. Working capital reflects the liquid position of the company; basically its ability to endure economic hardship. The more positive the working capital position, the greater the ability to weather financial storms or react quickly to opportunity.<\/span><\/p>\n The working capital turnover rate formula uses net sales as the numerator and working capital as the denominator. The common goal is to have a very high value which indicates leveraging net current assets in the sales process.<\/span><\/p>\n To prove its value and of course explain its flaws, this chapter will first explain the components of the formula.<\/span><\/p>\n Working Capital Turnover Rate = Net Sales Then, it will also explain the relationship of the two components and why this ratio has merit. Next this article will educate the reader about the existing flaws and its limited scope. Finally, this article will explain how it is best to apply the ratio to maximize its value in evaluating a small business.<\/span><\/p>\n The formula’s two components are net sales and working capital.The following subsections explain these two values in more detail.<\/span><\/p>\n Many accountants fail to understand that there is a difference between revenue and\u00a0s<\/a>ales<\/a>. Revenue is all sources of income including sales (sales are a subset); interest on investments, penalties charged to customers and gains on the sale of fixed assets<\/span><\/strong><\/a>.\u00a0 Sales reflect the primary purpose (product or service provided) of the business. The formula is restricted to sales as the idea behind the formula is\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>to relate sales to working capital. Net sales<\/span>\u00a0refines sales further to the net final amount actually sold.\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Here is an example of the revenue section for identifying net sales.<\/span><\/p>\n Revenue<\/strong> The key is to use net sales. Both returns and allowances directly affect working capital. Returns increase the inventory balance and allowances decrease accounts receivable (traditional credits provided to long-term customers).<\/span><\/p>\n Net sales is a function of the income statement; whereas working capital is a function of the balance sheet. Working capital uses both current assets and current liabilities. Gross working capital (current assets) less current liabilities is net working capital.<\/span><\/p>\n For this formula to work, net working capital must be positive. Therefore all current assets have to exceed the value of current liabilities. This means the ratio must be greater than 1:1.<\/span><\/p>\n For the average entrepreneur, obtaining the two values is easy. First simply get net sales from a detailed income statement (profit and loss statement). Secondly, subtract current liabilities from current assets to obtain net working capital. Now both values are inserted into the formula to get the ratio<\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n The purpose of the formula is to evaluate the ability of a business to leverage its assets. In this case, the formula is not evaluating all assets just the ability to leverage net current assets (working capital). For simplicity, assume net sales are $5 Million and net working capital is $200,000. The result is a ratio of 25:1.<\/span><\/p>\n Working Capital Turnover Rate = Net Sales<\/u>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 = $5,000,000<\/u>\u00a0 \u00a0=\u00a0\u00a0 25:1<\/span> If net sales increases to $5.5 Million then the rate increases to 27.5:1. This means the company is doing more volume of work,with the same level of net current assets. This is actually a positive sign. The principle is also true if net current assets decreases to $150,000. Look at this result:<\/span><\/p>\n Working Capital Turnover Rate = Net Sales<\/u>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 = $5,000,000<\/u> \u00a0= 33.33:1 Again, the formula is evaluating the ability to leverage assets. The higher the turnover rate, the better the leveraging of net current assets.<\/span><\/p>\n But now, let’s break this down further. Any entrepreneur or business owner would love to have more working capital. In reality, working capital is essential for long-term survival. Working capital exists for two reasons: 1) it increases solvency and 2) provides funds for business opportunities (purchasing fixed assets, utilizing early payment discounts, bulk purchases etc.). The higher the working capital, the more secure the business operation. Assuming sales is again $5,000,000 and working capital increases to $300,000, the working capital turnover rate decreases to 16.667:1.<\/span><\/p>\n
\n<\/u>.<\/span> \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Working Capital<\/span><\/p>\nWorking Capital Turnover Formula<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\n
Net Sales<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/u>Gross Sales\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0$ZZZ,ZZZ<\/span>
\n – Discounts\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0(ZZ,ZZZ)
\n<\/u>Adjusted Gross Sales\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0ZZZ,ZZZ<\/span>
\n Less:<\/span>
\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0– Returns\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 ($Z,ZZZ<\/span>
\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0– Allowances\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0(ZZ,ZZZ)
\n<\/u>Subtotal Returns & Allowances\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0(ZZ,ZZZ)
\n<\/u>Net Sales\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0ZZZ,ZZZ<\/span>
\n Other Revenue\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 ZZ,ZZZ<\/span>
\n Total Revenue\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0$ZZZ,ZZZ<\/u><\/span><\/p>\nWorking Capital<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n
Working Capital Turnover – Formula Analysis<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\n
\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Working Capital\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 $200,000<\/span><\/p>\n
\n<\/u>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Working Capital\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 $150,000<\/span><\/p>\n